The San Marcos City Council finds itself split on the issue of third party review of spending as it pertains to a compensation package expected to soon be approved.
The measure would allow the council to take the money ($500 a month for council members and $750 a month for the mayor) and accept it as an addition to their reimbursable expense account or refuse to take it at all.
With all due respect to present and future council members, the more transparency in government we can have ... especially when it comes to compensation and expense accounts ... the better.
This is especially true with a new system like the one this city is now initiating.
Taxpayers are curious how this compensation plan will work, and they deserve adequate assurances that it is operating as it should.
A quarterly third party review of this system speaks not to the honesty and integrity of our elected officials, but simply to the important public business at hand.
It is a business which works best for everyone when the sun shines brightly on all the fine print. RHR
Editorials
Not an insult, just business
- Editorials
-
-
The benefits are life saving
As Central Texas Medical Center’s annual HealthCheck screening nears, it’s a good time to consider the true benefits of such an event.
- Water watching must begin now
- Make auction day a pay day
- Home run for San Marcos
-
A century-long partnership
We here at the Record hope many members of the San Marcos community will join us as we celebrate our 100th year of service to San Marcos.
- Redistricting dance painful
- Let’s do it right
- Down but not out
-
It makes ‘cents’
A story on page 3A of today’s edition of the Record tells of a contest which, if the votes go well, could mean $10,000 for math education in San Marcos.
-
Still magical
Before the dust – or perhaps mud would be a better word in this case – settles on the Sights & Sounds of Christmas celebration, some well-deserved kudos must be offered.
- More Editorials Headlines
-
The benefits are life saving






